| Author | Messages | |
baaz
Posts:637
Insaf Shaheen
Moderator
 | | 05/07/2007 12:10 PM |
| AoA,
guys, let us take a discussion over what this New World Order really is... come forward with facts and investigative reports:
Predictions of events that will occur under the NWO rule include:
* The abolition of private property rights and gun ownership
* world-wide perequation under UN control
* all national and local elections controlled by the UN
* the US constitution replaced by the UN charter
* only approved religions will be allowed to exist – as parts of the One World Religion, or alternatively mandatory secularism with all religions made illegal
* interdiction of politically incorrect opinions by UN laws and charters, such as statements deemed discriminatory, critical of minorities, anti-feminist, anti-homosexual or illiberal
* home schooling will be illegal and there will be a UN-approved curriculum
* even more radical perspectives fear military bases will be turned into concentration camps to confine those who defy the NWO, as prisoners of opinion.
* 80% of the world population will be killed and the remainer will be packed to cities.
* forced vacinations
* people embedded with tracking microchips
* martial law
| | | |
| NaqviDawar
Posts:0
| | 05/07/2007 12:49 PM |
| Do not worry about NWO,
Think about MWO (MUNQAFIQ WORLD ORDER)
Imran Khan Nazi is on the top
WITH 17 PEOPLE DEAD and anti-American sentiment even higher than usual in the Muslim world, people are looking for someone to blame for the riots that flowed from Newsweek's Koran story. So far, it has been pinned on everyone from Mark Whitaker to the U.S. military. But the real villain is Pakistani politician Imran Khan.
On Friday, May 6 Khan catapulted the 300-word Newsweek story about a Koran being flushed down the toilet into headline news across the Muslim world by brandishing the article at a press conference and demanding that Pakistani president Gen. Pervez Musharraf secure an apology from George W. Bush for the incident. It is unlikely Khan chanced upon the item. Just days before, Khan had tried to spark a similar firestorm over a Washington Times cartoon depicting the Pakistani government as America's lapdog. Clearly in search of grist for the anti-American mill, Khan's demagoguery speaks to his own two-facedness and to a downside of military rule in Pakistan.
KHAN EMBODIES THE HYPOCRISY of Muslim elites who inveigh against the West by day and enjoy its pleasures by night. His fame in Pakistan comes from cricket not politics: Khan is the best cricketer Pakistan has ever produced. But in London many remember him as an even greater playboy. Throughout the 1980s Khan was linked to a string of beautiful women. In 1988 he told Australia's Sunday Mail, "Pakistan society encourages marriage. There, I lead a very steady, comfortable life. Here, it is more exciting. The pace is
faster. Because of the nightclubs and parties, it is a very good place to be single."
But as his cricket career wound down and he began to develop political ambitions, Khan became more reticent about his lifestyle. In 1992 when a London Evening Standard reporter asked him if he found his conquests fulfilling he turned bashful: "Er, by answering that question I put myself in a difficult position because this will get quoted in Pakistan. And in Pakistan, the mere fact that you admit you're having affairs upsets a lot of people's sensitivities. I respect my own culture and a lot of young people look up to me. It's a big responsibility for me not to make these admissions in public. Everyone knows I'm a single man and a normal man. But there's no need to stick it down their throats." His ex-girlfriends were less discreet, though. One observed to the Times, that same year, that Imran "juggled his girlfriends extremely elegantly . . . and he likes mangoes."
After his playing career ended in 1992, Khan entered politics under the tutelage of Lt.-Gen. Hamid Gul, the former Pakistani intelligence chief famous for fueling the Taliban's rise in Afghanistan. (Gul believes that September 11 was a U.S. conspiracy.) Khan, a man who once captained the Oxford University cricket team and was a feature at London's trendiest places, now turned against the culture he had previously enjoyed.
In 1995 he denounced the West with its "fat women in miniskirts" (presumably the skinny ones in miniskirts Khan had dated were okay) and proclaimed that the "West is falling because of their addiction to sex and obscenity." He also chastised Pakistanis who looked to the West for ideas, saying "I hate it when our leaders or elite feel that by licking the soles of the feet of foreign countries we will somehow be given aid and we will progress."
So it came as something of a surprise that year when he married an English society beauty, Jemima Goldsmith, who was half his age and far worse--for the Islamists he was courting politically--half-Jewish. The reaction to the marriage in Pakistan was hostile and put a rapid stop to Khan's political momentum. In a Pakistani newspaper column defending his marriage Khan mused that, "I suppose if my marriage proves one point, it is that I am not a politician."
Khan initially won liberal and Western hearts by building a cancer hospital and fashioning himself as a reformer, but he has turned increasingly to hard-line Islamist politics. After Khan cast a vote in favor of the Islamist candidate for prime minister in 2002, a leader in his party told a Pakistani monthly, "Khan has more than a soft corner for the ousted Afghan Taliban. He thinks that the orthodox religious militia did a great service to Afghanistan and Islam before they became a target of the Americans." However, Khan could never become the standard-bearer of Pakistan's Islamists while married to a Western girl--even if she had converted to Islam. Unsurprisingly, in 2004 he and Goldsmith divorced, each citing cultural differences.
Khan's ambition burns brightly but he is the only member of his party in parliament, and enjoys little popular support. His strategy for getting to the top is to climb on the anti-Musharraf bandwagon. "By the time we have the next general elections," said Khan recently, "we would see two broad-based political alliances in the
country, pro-Musharraf and anti-Musharraf." The easiest way to attack Musharraf, of course, is to attack his American protectors. Unfortunately, Musharraf has decided he will stay in power beyond 2007, keeping Khan's incentive to bash America intact. The rise of men like Imran Khan is the price America pays for backing a Muslim dictator--no matter how progressive--in the name of stability.
NOT THAT KHAN scorns America entirely: He likes its money. On May 15, just days after the riots killed 17 people and injured dozens of others, Khan was in Washington, D.C. raising $175,000 for his cancer hospital. His fundraising tour also took him to Denver, Los Angeles, and New York. But don't expect him to mention back in Lahore that American generosity is keeping his hospital going.
Even his political allies find Khan's duplicity hard to take. In 2002 one of his party leaders remarked: "Even we are finding it difficult to figure out the real Imran. He dons the shalwar-kameez and preaches desi and religious values while in Pakistan, but transforms himself completely while rubbing shoulders with the elite in Britain and elsewhere in the West." Khan claims that his marriage proved he wasn't a politician but his divorce and his recent demagoguery show that he now is one, albeit one of the worst sort.
James Forsyth is an assistant editor and Jai Singh is research editor at Foreign Policy.
Source:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/658vhcpk.asp?pg=2
Also check
http://www.imrankhanexposed.com/IMRANKHANEXPOSED/index.html
| | | |
| baaz
Posts:637
Insaf Shaheen
Moderator
| | 05/07/2007 1:12 PM |
| | Exactly...that is include in the NWO! And it is people like you! | | | |
| safee
Posts:601
Insaf Shaheen
Moderator
Newsletter Liaison
| | 27/07/2007 4:25 AM |
| Islam and Muslims are here to stay!
And that is a fact...
As numerously said by the Quran..
But yes, there can be troubling times...and we are going through them already!
| |
"Afraad Keh hathon main hey Akwam kee taqdeer,
Har fard hey millat keh mukadar ka sitara.."
-Allama Muhammad Iqbal | |
| baaz
Posts:637
Insaf Shaheen
Moderator
| | 27/07/2007 7:18 AM |
| Safee,
I agree with you...and it is true. But the question is whether we should do things and prepare the ground or just wait for miracles to happen. I know we will go through tough times, I mean the first Bayat of Medhi will be by 300 people...that tell us that it will be a secret Bayat...
...so what I mean is...tough times will come and Islam will win, that is for sure. But what is out position - sit and wait or contribute? | | | |
| safee
Posts:601
Insaf Shaheen
Moderator
Newsletter Liaison
| | 27/07/2007 11:14 AM |
| There is ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT that we should put in our two cents..
I mean our judgement is not on whether mehdi won or lost, but on the performance which we did in our lives on earth! | |
"Afraad Keh hathon main hey Akwam kee taqdeer,
Har fard hey millat keh mukadar ka sitara.."
-Allama Muhammad Iqbal | |
| baaz
Posts:637
Insaf Shaheen
Moderator
| | 27/07/2007 11:30 AM |
| | Exactly, but to really contribute - we first need to realize what is happening, which is beyond our computer/tv screens and daily newspapers. But how come people began calling it conspiracies then?! | | | |
| A.H Yousaf
Posts:60
Insaf Tiger
| | 27/07/2007 11:51 AM |
| AOA,
Baaz very interesting post <img src='http://www.insaf.pk/desktopmodules/ntforums/images/emoticons/smile.gif' height='20' width='20' border='0' title='Smile' align='absmiddle'>
Do u know Alex Jones if not visit his website www.infowars.com , he done a lot of work on NWO and 9/11, 7/7 and other big events. He also talks about WW1, WW2, UN and other organizations. I am sure u know about Free masons!!! I am not saying Alex is right or wrong. It really strange to see free masons secret sings. Alex uploaded many documentaries on GOOGLE videos as well. MUST WATCH THEM
| | | |
| baaz
Posts:637
Insaf Shaheen
Moderator
| | 27/07/2007 12:48 PM |
| Wa aleikum salam,
Thanx for your thoughts. I have been through several of his documentaries also... look my post "are we muslims fools or just fools". That is a story from ex-free mason.
Safee, Yousaf - would you be interested in joining a knowledge group and share your thoughts and help each other increase knowledge... almost on all kind of topics.
What do you think?! | | | |
|
|