The Destabilization of Pakistan: Finding Clarity in the Baluchistan Conundrum
by Talha Mujaddidi
|  | Global Research, April 24, 2009 | Axis of Logic - 2009-04-23 |
As
in all of his analyses of the battle for Pakistan, Talha Mujaddidi
provides a rare look into the internal struggle of the Pakistan people
and the interference in their domestic affairs by the United States,
India and other foreign elements. For those who are unfamiliar with the
terms, places and names in this report, Talha provides a glossary at
the end of the article. It is especially important that we learn and
understand what is happening in Pakistan as Washington is opening up a
new front in this country in their "war on terror". - Les Blough, Axis of Logic Editor
April 23, 2009 Excerpt: "The
problem for US is that BLA alone is not able to break away Baluchistan
from Pakistan. Of the 5% population of Baluchistan they don’t even have
support of 10% Balochi population. The Pakistan Army and ISI are
resisting the assault in national and strategic interests of Pakistan.
The Great Game of Brzezinski will surely continue in Baluchistan and
rest of Pakistan, the people of Pakistan are ready to counter this
great game now we need leadership and some courage. It will take some
time to achieve courage and leadership but it will come eventually.
Street revolutions are easy to carry out the hard part is the mental
revolution. That is what is required right now to challenge the US
global hegemony."
Baluchistan is
strategically located East of Iran and to the South of Afghanistan. It
has a port at Gwadar that was built by China. Gwadar lies at the
opening of Strait of Hormuz. Baluchistan has huge quantities of natural
gas, and unexplored oil reserves. More importantly US wants to control
the port of Gwadar, and eventually start their dream oil pipeline from
Central Asia, through Afghanistan into Baluchistan and Gwadar.
Baluchistan is the largest province of Pakistan in terms of area and it
covers almost 48% of Pakistan’s area. But its population accounts for
only 5% of the total population of Pakistan. Ethnically Baluchistan is
divided into Balochs, and Pathans, followed by other small minorities.
The state capital is Quetta, (recently termed as nerve center of
Taliban by US Generals). Like all
histories in South Asia, or Middle East, the history of Baluchistan is
long, complex, and would require a long article to cover all the
details. So a brief synopsis is sufficient to get us rolling before we
come to the point. | "Baluchistan has the worst human rights record out of all the provinces of Pakistan." | Baluchistan
like, Afghanistan and Tribal Areas of Pakistan is a tribal society.
Many different Sardars (tribal chiefs), rule their respective tribes,
often with serious disregard for human rights. Development wise,
Baluchistan is the most backward province in Pakistan. There may be
some weight in the argument that the federal government in Pakistan has
neglected the development of Baluchistan, but equal responsibility lies
with the Sardars of Baluchistan who enjoy immense power in their
tribes. They are unwilling to come into the main stream society, have
monopoly over the laws and regulations of the state, while they
themselves sit in provincial and national parliaments, yet they don’t
work for the development of their own people.
Baluchistan has
the worst human rights record out of all the provinces of Pakistan.
Every time horrific human rights atrocities are committed in
Baluchistan tribal chiefs defend the abuses by claiming them to be part
of their tribal cultural norms. Since the independence of Pakistan,
most of the tribes have accepted Pakistan as their homeland and have
tried to come into the mainstream Pakistani society. But Bugti and
Marri tribal leaders have always been a source of trouble for Pakistan.
Currently Brahamdagh Bugti (grandson of former Bugti tribe leader and
former chief minister of Baluchistan, Nawab Akbar Bugti5 is the leader of a runaway terrorist group, the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA)4
operating out of Kandhar, Afghanistan. Before Brahamdagh, Balach Marri,
son of Nawab Khair Baksh Marri, was leader of BLA, and he was killed in
Afghanistan in 2007. Covert Operations against Pakistan A new dirty game
of geo-politics has already started in Baluchistan, Pakistan. To
understand the recent wave of violence in Baluchistan we must
understand the vested interests in Baluchistan. The root cause of
violence in Baluchistan is not internal poverty or lack of development
but the covert operations of foreign intelligence agencies. Internal
issues might act as catalysts to inflame the situation but the root
cause is foreign interference in internal affairs of Baluchistan. The
main group responsible for violence in Baluchistan is the BLA4.
Chief of the BLA Brahamdagh Bugti, in his recent interview with
Pakistani news channel AAJ TVm declared that he will attack and kill
non Baloch population of Baluchistan. In other words he threatened
killing of innocent Pakistani civilians on ethnic lines. This is just
taking words out of Col Ralph Peter’s plan for balkanization of
Pakistan, along the lines of Yugoslavia (June 2006 issue of The Armed
Forces Journal). Bugti also asked for support of India and other powers
to help him break away Pakistan’s Baluchistan. (For related news read
two of my older articles on Axis of Logic, Playing with Fire in Pakistan, - and Now or Never. Pakistan must change its policy in war on terror). According to Global Research scholar, Michel Chossudovsky: “In the current
geopolitical context, the separatist movement is in the process of
being hijacked by foreign powers. British intelligence is allegedly
providing covert support to Baluchistan separatists (which from the
outset have been repressed by Pakistan's military). In June 2006,
Pakistan's Senate Committee on Defense accused British intelligence of
"abetting the insurgency in the province bordering Iran"
[Baluchistan]..(Press Trust of India, 9 August 2006). Ten British MPs
were involved in a closed door session of the Senate Committee on
Defense regarding the alleged support of Britain's Secret Service to
Baloch separatists (Ibid). Also of relevance are reports of CIA and
Mossad support to Baloch rebels in Iran and Southern Afghanistan."
In a 2006 research article on Baluchistan which was published in Pak Tribune in 2006, Farzana Shah,
a current affairs analyst for BrassTacks, a think tank based in
Islamabad, highlighted the role which is being played by a British
think tank against Baluchistan. Shah writes, “In this regard
the Foreign Policy Centre (FPC) United Kingdom arranged a seminar on
Baluchistan province of Pakistan in collaboration with the so-called
Baluchistan Rights Movement on 27th June 2006 in the House of Commons,
London. It was highly disappointing as it was abashedly a one-sided
cheap propaganda rather than discussing the real situation. By a mere
look at the panel of the participants of the seminar one could easily
figure out that it consisted of only anti-Pakistan elements and some
self-styled activists advocating terrorism in the province. There were
no representatives from government of Pakistan or even from the elected
provincial government of Baluchistan in the seminar. It is just
unfortunate that the Foreign Policy Centre which is expected to present
fair suggestions to the British government to engage a country of their
concern for important issues, indulged in such a blatant one-sided
propaganda against Pakistan through the said seminar.”
Shah also points out in the article how a Government of Baluchistan is setup in exile in Jerusalem, Israel. She gives the details in her article. | | Two
Indian assets: Brahamdagh Bugti & Balach Marri (R). Marri died in
an ambush in 2007 while crossing from Afghanistan to Pakistan after
meeting his sponsors there. |
The
question is, what is the role of US, Afghanistan, India, and Iran in
Baluchistan quagmire and what is at stake for these countries?
Afghanistan | "Afghanistan’s soil has been used again and again to cause trouble inside Pakistan." | Afghanistan
was the only country that did not welcome Pakistan in 1947 at the time
of our independence. The only time when there was no trouble inside
Pakistan from Afghanistan was during the time of Taliban rule in
Afghanistan. Taliban being Pukhtoon cleaned Afghanistan of Indian and
Iranian assets (both India and Iran supports Northern Alliance, which
is in government right now in Afghanistan). Afghanistan’s soil has been
used again and again to cause trouble inside Pakistan. Currently BLA is
operating from Kandahar, Afghanistan. BLA enjoys support from Indian
RAW in terms of finances, logistics, and weapons. Recent report of
Foreign Affairs, by Christine Fair of RAND Corporation gives us the inside.
“Having visited
the Indian mission in Zahedan, Iran, I can assure you they are not
issuing visas as the main activity! Moreover, India has run operations
from its mission in Mazar, Afghanistan (through which it supported the
Northern Alliance) and is likely doing so from the other consulates it
has reopened in Jalalabad and Qandahar along the border. Indian
officials have told me privately that they are pumping money into
Baluchistan. Kabul has encouraged India to engage in provocative
activities such as using the Border Roads Organization to build
sensitive parts of the Ring Road and use the Indo-Tibetan police force
for security. It is also building schools on a sensitive part of the
border in Kunar--across from Bajaur (Pakistan’s Tribal Area where
Pakistan Army had to carry out a major operation to eliminate TTP6 militants). "Kabul's
motivations for encouraging these activities are as obvious as India's
interest in engaging in them. Even if by some act of miraculous
diplomacy the territorial issues were to be resolved, Pakistan would
remain an insecure state. Given the realities of the subcontinent
(e.g., India's rise and its more effective foreign relations with all
of Pakistan's near and far neighbors), these fears are bound to grow,
not lessen. This suggests that without some means of compelling
Pakistan to abandon its reliance upon militancy, it will become ever
more interested in using it -- and the militants will likely continue
to proliferate beyond Pakistan's control.”
Iran Iran
historically has enjoyed good relations with its neighbors including
Pakistan during the time of Shah of Iran, but since then their
relationship with Pakistan and Arab world has deteriorated.
Strategically, Iran would like to maintain balance of power tipped in
its favor in the region, this means the Pakistan’s strategic interests
should be undermined, as they are at the moment. Taliban, Iran’s
nemesis in Afghanistan is no longer in power, India, Iran’s ally and
Pakistan’s arch enemy is enjoying a strong foothold in Afghanistan at
the moment. Iran is also afraid of Jandullah’s covert operations
against Iran, from Baluchistan. According to an April 2007 report by Brian Rossand and Christopher Isham of ABC News, the United States governmenthad been secretly encouraging and advising the Jandullah in its attacks. Jandullah is a
terrorist group that was created by CIA, and is responsible for
terrorist activities inside Iran. Iran has spent a lot of money
developing its Chabahar port, which is just 100 miles from Gwadar port
of Pakistan. Gwadar port was built by China. Iran does not want Gwadar
to become prominent and Chabahar to be sidelined, especially since Iran
is isolated in the world at the moment. Iran has huge reserves of gas
and it would like India to gain access to these reserves since India is
its ally and Iran-India friendship will grow if India can gain access
to Iranian gas reserves. Iran would also like trade with India to
increase in future.
| TAPI: Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India |
| IPI: Iran, Pakistan, India |
India
| "India also believes that an independent Baluchistan will likely become a proxy of Iran, India and Afghanistan." |
India
is Pakistan arch enemy, first of all India has never accepted Pakistan
as an independent sovereign nation. India was directly responsible for
breakup of East Pakistan and formation of Bangladesh. India and
Pakistan have fought three wars with each other. India is at the moment
chief regional ally of US, and NATO. India believes that Pakistan is at
the brink of break up and India must focus on building its relationship
with Central Asia, Iran, and Afghanistan, and capture oil and gas
reserves from Central Asia and Iran, through Afghanistan and Pakistan.
India also believes that an independent Baluchistan will likely become
a proxy of Iran, India and Afghanistan. Capt (r) Bharat Verma of Indian Defense Review, writes,“That New Delhi
is its own enemy became obvious, when it permitted the creation of a
pure Islamic State on its borders. This nation-state contradicts every
democratic and multi-cultural value dear to India. Therefore, if New
Delhi has not slept a wink since the creation of Pakistan, it has no
one except itself to blame! Many conveniently propose the myth that a
stable Pakistan is in India’s interest. This is a false proposition.
The truth is that Pakistan is bad news for the Indian Union since
1947-stable or otherwise. With Pakistan on the brink of collapse due to
massive internal as well as international contradictions, it is matter
of time before it ceases to exist. Multiple benefits will accrue to the
Union of India on such demise.”
Verma Continues ... “If ever the
national interests are defined with clarity and prioritized, the
foremost threat to the Union (and for centuries before) materialized on
the western periphery, continuously. To defend this key threat to the
Union, New Delhi should extend its influence through export of both,
soft and hard power towards Central Asia from where invasions have been
mounted over centuries. Cessation of Pakistan as a state facilitates
furtherance of this pivotal national objective. “The
self-destructive path that Islamabad chose will either splinter the
state into many parts or it will wither away-a case of natural
progression to its logical conclusion. In either case Baluchistan will
achieve independence. For New Delhi this opens a window of opportunity
to ensure that the Gwadar port does not fall into the hands of the
Chinese. In this, there is synergy between the political objectives of
the Americans and the Indians. Our existing goodwill in Baluchistan
requires intelligent leveraging.”
India does not
have natural gas reserves, and it desperately needs gas from Iran. But
US is against Iran-Pakistan-India (IPI) pipeline. If IPI project comes
through than the stability and security of Iran, Pakistan and India
will be in the interest of these respective countries. US would not
like this, since it takes away an important leverage from a superpower,
that of playing one nation against another. US have proposed the idea
of Independent Baluchistan, which India does not mind at all. India has
gained strong foot hold inside Afghanistan. A road link connects
Iranian port of Chabahar to Afghanistan. India has built a
ring-road inside Afghanistan linking Iran to Afghanistan. With back
channel diplomacy going on between Iran and US, India and Iran both
would like NATO and US supplies to go through Chabahar, Iran rather
than Karachi, Pakistan. India strongly believes that Independent
Baluchistan is inevitable and is casting all its bets on this deal.
| Road link from Iran into Afghanistan (see checkered line, lower left arrow) |
Washington's interest in Baluchistan | "It is imperative the Baluchistan, an energy rich province must not come under control of China." | According to a study titled “Baloch Nationalism and the energy politics of energy resources: the changing context of separatism in Pakistan”,
by Robert G.Wirsing, of Strategic Studies Institute, a think tank of
U.S army, it is imperative the Baluchistan, an energy rich province
must not come under control of China. China built Gwadar port, and
would like to expand more trade and energy routes through Pakistan via
Baluchistan.
To begin with
China is interested in a gas pipeline from Iran through Pakistan’s into
Western China. This is something that is not acceptable to US. China
could station some of its naval ships at Gwadar in future should the
need arise to provide security to its cargo; this is again something
that is not acceptable to US. On the list of US agenda is to secure the
Indian Ocean and its strategic routes, and Gwadar right at the mouth of
Strait of Hormuz is one of those routes. As mentioned before US is
using Baluchistan as a base to carry out covert operations against Iran
using Jandullah. After 9/11 US is also using an airfield of Pakistan
Air force in Baluchistan for its operations in war on terror. The U.S. is
looking into taking direct control of Gwadar, possibly by capturing
Gwadar port, so that they can make a land route through Baluchistan
into Southern Afghanistan, this will give them an alternate supply
route for their troops. Baluchistan must be under US control so that
gas pipelines from Central Asia can pump gas through Afghanistan into
coast of Baluchistan. The US believes that Balkanization of Pakistan
and setup of independent Baluchistan will dismantle the hope of
resurgent Pakistan in the near future, paving the way for a dominant
Iran taking control of Middle East while India will be able to take
control of South Asia including Afghanistan. Brzezinski believes that
Iran not Arab world is the natural ally of US in the Middle East. The
current US government is using the foreign policy ideals of Brzezinski,
which calls for using Islamic militant and Iran against China and
Russia. Conclusion
| "The
solution of Baluchistan lies with a strong government in Islamabad that
is a nationalist government and not a puppet of IMF/WB/CIA." |
Current Pakistani government is not able to safeguard Pakistan’s national interests. When Zardari3
became president he authorized release of many BLA terrorist who were
held up by security forces in detention. BLA has gotten ample time to
regroup and re-arm during the last few months. It is very interesting
that the current Chief Minister of Baluchistan, Nawab Aslam Raisani
before becoming CM, said in an interview, "We will not go for any type
of compromise," says Nawab Raisani. "We want total autonomy." According to author of bestselling book, ‘The Way of the World’,
Ron Suskind, Raisani is on the payroll of top western intelligence
agencies. Given the level of US penetration in Pakistan’s domestic
politics it is no surprise. The solution of
Baluchistan lies with a strong government in Islamabad that is a
nationalist government and not a puppet of IMF/WB/CIA. There should be
no doubt in anyone’s mind that BLA does not represent the aggrieved
Baloch people. BLA is a terrorist outfit and it must be dealt with
accordingly. We need to get rid of this government that is working
nothing like a democracy. Key decisions are taken by either Zardari or
his important Washington approved advisors. We need a new setup of
nationalist that are willing to stand up to US and make independent
policy decision in the best interest of Pakistan. To counter the
growing influence of India, Iran and US in Baluchistan it is a must
that old contracts with China be renewed and new development projects
must be initiated with Chinese help. The local population of
Baluchistan must be given more shares in jobs and resources. This is
only achievable if we have patriots in the provincial government of
Baluchistan, not scoundrels who are abusing patriotism for their
personal greed. The problem for
US is that BLA alone is not able to break away Baluchistan from
Pakistan. Of the 5% population of Baluchistan they don’t even have
support of 10% Balochi population. The Pakistan Army and ISI are
resisting the assault in national and strategic interests of Pakistan.
The Great Game of Brzezinski will surely continue in Baluchistan and
rest of Pakistan, the people of Pakistan are ready to counter this
great game now we need leadership and some courage. It will take some
time to achieve courage and leadership but it will come eventually.
Street revolutions are easy to carry out the hard part is the mental
revolution. That is what is required right now to challenge the US
global hegemony.
|